Guidance for Animal Research Industry Personnel

Do you work in an animal research facility? Are you a researcher whose research uses animals? Do you work for a pharmaceutical company? Or do you serve on an animal ethics committee?

All of these roles hold a huge responsibility. Ethics committees are the only real level at which the validity and justification of the research can be challenged, and it is imperative that they are used for maximum impact. The use of animals in science is embedded in culture and practice, as well as education and regulation, and questioning its validity or necessity may be met with resistance. Whilst individuals working or volunteering in the animal industry may have the best intentions towards the minimising of harm to animal, sometimes external forces come into play which obstruct these intentions. From the information HRA receives, these pressures may include bullying, social pressure, lack of knowledge surrounding non-animal models, and the impact of hierarchies within institutions.

Pressure may be placed on researchers not to question animal use, despite any moral or scientific concerns expressed by the researcher. This is clear from the Test Subjects video, which features young researchers discussing the pressures placed upon them to use animals, despite the lack of relevance to their research.

 

humane research

Below are some tips and resources on how those working in the animal research industry can best serve the interests of both animals and the validity of research.

It is important to note that conducting biomedical research without animals is not simply a case of looking for a direct replacement for an animal model, as explained in this article by the UK organisation Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments. It is about experimental design focuses on the desired outcome and challenging faulty logic. A like-for-like replacement is not always possible, and if that is what an AEC is seeking, not finding, then using as a justification for animal use, this if a flawed approach.
You can use your influence as a driver for change to push for specific detail on the method and deliverables expected from the research applicant as justification for the animal model selection. A recent study showed that the current choice of a specific animal model in a project application for the use of animals in seems to be based on traditional acceptance and standard responses rather than robust substantiation for the choice of an animal model.

HRA welcomes open communication with anyone involved in the animal research industry, whether that be a question, complaint you wish to see investigated, or insider report.  Please contact us, or you can use the below form for anonymous contact. Complete confidence will be granted in either case.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Stay informed

Sign up to our newsletter for all the latest news and SMS campaign alerts.